HL7 Terminology (THO)
5.4.0 - Continuous Process Integration (ci build)
HL7 Terminology (THO) - Local Development build (v5.4.0) built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) Build Tools. See the Directory of published versions
| Official URL: http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/verificationresult-validation-process | Version: 1.0.0 | |||
| Draft as of 2018-06-05 | Maturity Level: 1 | Responsible: Health Level Seven International | Computable Name: Validation_process | |
| Other Identifiers: OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.888 | ||||
Copyright/Legal: This material derives from the HL7 Terminology THO. THO is copyright ©1989+ Health Level Seven International and is made available under the CC0 designation. For more licensing information see: https://terminology.hl7.org/license |
||||
The primary process by which the target is validated
References
This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)
Generated Narrative: ValueSet verificationresult-validation-process
Last updated: 2020-02-24 12:41:39+1100
Profile: Shareable ValueSet
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process
Generated Narrative: ValueSet
Last updated: 2020-02-24 12:41:39+1100
Profile: Shareable ValueSet
Expansion based on codesystem Validation-process v1.0.0 (CodeSystem)
This value set contains 9 concepts
| Code | System | Display | Definition |
| edit-check | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | edit check | A method checks the healthcare resource data against predefined rules or criteria to ensure accuracy and consistency. This method helps identify common errors, such as missing or incorrect fields, by flagging data that does not conform to expected standards. |
| valueset | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | value set | A method of verification that involves comparing the data in the healthcare resource against a predefined set of allowed values or codes. This ensures that the data adheres to accepted clinical terminologies, such as SNOMED CT or ICD-10, to maintain interoperability and accuracy. |
| primary | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | primary source | A verification method where the data in the healthcare resource is validated directly against the original source of the information. For example, verifying a practitioner’s license information by checking with the relevant licensing authority. This method ensures the highest level of accuracy. |
| multi | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | multiple sources | A verification method where data is cross-checked against multiple independent sources to ensure its accuracy and reliability. This method reduces the likelihood of errors by confirming that the information is consistent across various trusted sources. |
| standalone | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | standalone | A method where the healthcare resource is validated independently, without relying on external data sources or systems. The data is checked internally for consistency and completeness, often used when external verification is not feasible. |
| in-context | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | in context | This method involves verifying the data within the context of its use, considering related resources and the overall scenario. For example, checking that a practitioner’s role is appropriate for the services provided at a specific location. This method ensures that the data is not only correct but also contextually relevant. |
| manual | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | Manual | A verification method where human review is involved in checking the accuracy and completeness of the healthcare resource data. This process may include visual inspection, cross-referencing with physical documents, or other non-automated techniques. Manual verification is often used when automated methods are insufficient or unavailable. |
| attester | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | Attester | A method where a designated individual or entity formally certifies the accuracy of the healthcare resource data. This attestation process often involves a signature or an official statement confirming that the information has been reviewed and verified as correct. |
| extsource | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/validation-process | External source | Verification method where the data in the healthcare resource is validated against an independent, third-party data source. This could include external databases, registries, or authoritative organizations that provide reliable information. This method adds an extra layer of credibility by confirming data from an outside, trusted entity. |
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
| Level | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies |
| System | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
| Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance) |
| Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
| Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
| Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |
History
| Date | Action | Author | Custodian | Comment |
| 2023-11-14 | revise | Marc Duteau | TSMG | Add standard copyright and contact to internal content; up-476 |
| 2020-10-14 | revise | Grahame Grieve | Vocabulary WG | Reset Version after migration to UTG |
| 2020-05-07 | revise | Ted Klein | Vocabulary WG | format of name element edited for correctness in v4.1.1 (UTG Initial Release prep) |
| 2020-05-06 | revise | Ted Klein | Vocabulary WG | Migrated to the UTG maintenance environment and publishing tooling. |